At a glance.
- US court rules that the FBI’s warrantless FISA searches violated Fourth Amendment.
- US Justice Department indicts five individuals over North Korean IT worker scheme.
- Texas investigates four more car companies for alleged deceptive data collection practices.
US court rules that the FBI’s warrantless FISA searches violated Fourth Amendment
A federal court in New York has ruled that the FBI violated a US resident's Fourth Amendment rights by using communications collected under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) as evidence to prosecute him, Ars Technica reports. FISA authorizes the warrantless gathering of communications data from non-US residents outside the United States, but often involves incidental collection of US residents' conversations. The government's use of these communications has been a major point of controversy, with digital rights groups like the EFF and ACLU asserting that the law has led to widespread privacy violations.
Federal district Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall, in a decision made last month and unsealed this week, agreed with an appeals court ruling that "the government cannot circumvent application of the warrant requirement simply because queried information is already collected and held by the government." DeArcy Hall wrote. "To hold otherwise would effectively allow law enforcement to amass a repository of communications under Section 702, including those of US persons that can later be searched on demand without limitation. While communications of US persons may nonetheless be intercepted, incidentally or inadvertently, it would be paradoxical to permit warrantless searches of the same information that Section 702 is specifically designed to avoid collecting." The ruling stops short of banning all warrantless searches but emphasizes the need for tighter controls.
The case in question involved Albanian citizen and US resident Agron Hasbajrami, who was arrested at JFK airport in New York in 2011 and convicted of attempting to provide material support to terrorists. The Register notes that DeArcy Hall denied a request to suppress the evidence in this case for separate reasons, so Hasbajrami will remain in prison.