Top stories.
- US Supreme Court rules that geofence searches generally require warrants.
- Maximum-severity SimpleHelp flaw is now actively exploited.
- US government offers $10 million reward for info on Russian state-backed hackers.
US Supreme Court rules that geofence searches generally require warrants.
In a landmark 6-3 ruling, the US Supreme Court ruled yesterday that obtaining cellphone location history records is a search under the Fourth Amendment, meaning law enforcement generally must obtain a warrant before accessing this data from tech companies, the Record reports.
The case involved a Virginia man, Okello Chatrie, who was charged with bank robbery in 2019 after police found him by searching Google location history records. The police had obtained a warrant, but Chatrie's lawyer argued that the search was overly broad and should not have been allowed even with a warrant. Chatrie pleaded guilty and was sentenced to twelve years in prison after officers found $100,000 in cash, a gun, and demand notes at his home, but he retained the right to appeal the court's decision to allow this additional evidence. Chatrie's lawyer argues that the evidence is "fruit of the poisoned tree" because the initial geofence search was unreasonable. The Supreme Court sent the case back to the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to determine whether this specific warrant satisfied the Constitution's requirements.
Privacy advocates celebrated the decision, with George Washington University law professor Andrew Guthrie Ferguson telling the Record that "the Supreme Court [has] upgraded the Fourth Amendment to meet the digital age."

