Top stories.
- US Supreme Court weighs legality of geofence warrants.
- Researchers analyze a cyber sabotage framework that predates Stuxnet.
- Toronto police arrest three men accused of operating an SMS blaster.
US Supreme Court weighs legality of geofence warrants.
The US Supreme Court is hearing arguments today concerning the constitutionality of geofence warrants, a law enforcement technique that allows police to query tech companies' databases to identify mobile phones that were near the scene of a crime, NPR reports. The Supreme Court is weighing this technique against the Fourth Amendment's ban on unreasonable searches. Supporters argue that users who have opted in to location services have willingly reduced their expectations of privacy. Critics maintain that the technique amounts to a digital dragnet, allowing police to search across millions of accounts without individualized suspicion.
The case in question involves a 2019 bank robbery in Virginia, in which the thief was seen talking on his cellphone. After two months with no leads, police obtained a warrant to search Google's location data from the area around the bank on the day of the robbery. Google identified nineteen individuals, but disclosed only three of their names to the police. One of these individuals was the thief, who has since pleaded guilty.

